Dynamic modeling of nitrogen losses in river networks unravels the coupled effects of hydrological and biogeochemical processes

The importance of lotic systems as sinks for nitrogen inputs is well recognized. A fraction of nitrogen in streamflow is removed to the atmosphere via denitrification with the remainder exported in streamflow as nitrogen loads. At the watershed scale, there is a keen interest in understanding the factors that control the fate of nitrogen throughout the stream channel network, with particular attention to the processes that deliver large nitrogen loads to sensitive coastal ecosystems. We use a dynamic stream transport model to assess biogeochemical (nitrate loadings, concentration, temperature) and hydrological (discharge, depth, velocity) effects on reach-scale denitrification and nitrate removal in the river networks of two watersheds having widely differing levels of nitrate enrichment but nearly identical discharges. Stream denitrification is estimated by regression as a nonlinear function of nitrate concentration, streamflow, and temperature, using more than 300 published measurements from a variety of US streams. These relations are used in the stream transport model to characterize nitrate dynamics related to denitrification at a monthly time scale in the stream reaches of the two watersheds. Results indicate that the nitrate removal efficiency of streams, as measured by the percentage of the stream nitrate flux removed via denitrification per unit length of channel, is appreciably reduced during months with high discharge and nitrate flux and increases during months of low-discharge and flux. Biogeochemical factors, including land use, nitrate inputs, and stream concentrations, are a major control on reach-scale denitrification, evidenced by the disproportionately lower nitrate removal efficiency in streams of the highly nitrate-enriched watershed as compared with that in similarly sized streams in the less nitrate-enriched watershed. Sensitivity analyses reveal that these important biogeochemical factors and physical hydrological factors contribute nearly equally R. B. Alexander (&) J. K. Böhlke J. W. Harvey U.S. Geological Survey, 12201 Sunrise Valley Drive, Reston, VA 20192, USA e-mail: [email protected] E. W. Boyer Pennsylvania State University, University Park, PA 16802, USA M. B. David University of Illinois, Urbana, IL 61801, USA P. J. Mulholland Oak Ridge National Laboratory, Oak Ridge, TN 37831, USA S. P. Seitzinger Rutgers University, New Brunswick, NJ 08901, USA C. R. Tobias University of North Carolina, Wilmington, NC 28403, USA C. Tonitto Cornell University, Ithaca, NY 14853, USA W. M. Wollheim University of New Hampshire, Durham, NH 03824, USA 123 Biogeochemistry (2009) 93:91–116 DOI 10.1007/s10533-008-9274-8